This week I sit down with Prof. John Sheehan AM to reflect on and explore lessons from the Timber Creek case in the latest episode of The Customary Land Podcast.

Our far-reaching discussion includes recognition (and extinguishment) of inalienable customary land rights, which are precarious, Native Title, s.51 xxxi of the Constitution of Australia (‘just terms’ compensation), and the relationship to the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People’s.  The Timber Creek case provides helpful guidance about compensation (for extinguishment) that recognises the ‘cultural loss’ relating to the indigenous connection to the land (rather than ‘solatium’).

Full High Court of Australia background to the Timber Creek case can be accessed here.

The Judgement of the High Court in the Timber Creek case is here.

John also refers to his co-authored paper with Jasper Brown and Kenneth Rayner ‘On solatium: towards a rethinking of compensation‘.

For those who prefer to watch a video version, it is provided here.

In this episode of The Customary Land Podcast we explore who ‘owns’ Customary Land… and it isn’t as obvious as you may think!

The episode is built around an article that I co-authored with a former lawyer colleague, Krishn Shah, in which we explored customary land ownership using Fiji as a case study. Using Fiji is helpful, as Native Land Records have been kept since the time of the Deed of Cession to Queen Victoria in 1874. This sets Fiji apart from its Pacific neighbours, as well as many over Indigenous groups. Moreover, since 1940 indigenous ‘landowners’ in Fiji have had their surplus land managed by the Native Land Trust Board (now the iTaukei Land Trust Board), meaning the customary ‘landowners’ have benefited from having legal and property specialists representing then in all land dealings.

Paper by Spike Boydell & Krishn Shah
‘An inquiry into the nature of land ownership in Fiji’

Paper by Joeli Balendrokadroka
‘The Fijian Understanding of the Deed of Cession Treaty 1874’